Naijamatta

This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese artificial intelligence company that establishes open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and acts as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model provides responses comparable to other contemporary large language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a considerably lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were developed in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to limit the capability of these two nations to develop advanced AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its very first totally free chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had gone beyond ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share price to stop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more recognized competitors has been referred to as “overthrowing AI“, [8] making up “the first chance at what is emerging as a worldwide AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a new age of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative artificial intelligence algorithms, models, and training information open-source, allowing its code to be easily available for use, adjustment, watching, and creating files for developing functions. [13] The business reportedly intensely recruits young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer science field to diversify its designs’ understanding and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading because the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while participating in Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, suggesting its code is easily readily available for use, adjustment, and viewing. This consists of authorization to gain access to and use the source code, along with style files, for developing purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip constraints on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer began an artificial general intelligence laboratory dedicated to research study establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital firms were reluctant in providing financing as it was unlikely that it would have the ability to generate an exit in a short time period. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong efficiency for a low rate, DeepSeek ended up being known as the catalyst for China’s AI design cost war. It was quickly called the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the cost of their AI models to compete with the company. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no comprehensive strategies for commercialization; [20] this likewise permits its technology to avoid the most stringent provisions of China’s AI guidelines, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to abide by the federal government’s controls on details. [3]

DeepSeek’s working with preferences target technical capabilities instead of work experience, leading to many new hires being either current university graduates or designers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the business hires people without any computer technology background to help its innovation comprehend other subjects and understanding locations, including having the ability to create poetry and perform well on the notoriously challenging Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available totally free to both researchers and commercial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license contract (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and accountable downstream use” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline data. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was developed to take on other LLMs available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark results higher than most open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the like those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the two Base models was likewise released simultaneously, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed comparable efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are always queried, and “routed professionals” that may not be. They found this to assist with skilled balancing. In standard MoE, some professionals can become excessively relied on, while other experts may be rarely utilized, wasting criteria. Attempting to balance the professionals so that they are similarly utilized then triggers professionals to replicate the same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to find out core capabilities that are typically used, and let the routed professionals to find out the peripheral capabilities that are seldom used. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit design was a process benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This reward model was then used to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math questions “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward design was constantly updated throughout training to prevent benefit hacking. This resulted in the RL design.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two bigger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 phases. The first phase was trained to fix mathematics and coding issues. This phase used 1 reward model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The 2nd stage was trained to be practical, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage used 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and security benefit designs were trained on human preference data. The rule-based reward model was by hand programmed. All trained benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the launched version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose 2-staged RL, because they discovered that RL on thinking data had “special attributes” various from RL on general information. For example, RL on thinking might improve over more training actions. [31]

The two V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and experienced likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to help “further research study and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 designs were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and used the mixture of professionals (MoE) variant formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related direction information, then integrated with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math problems was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code problems was generated by a reward model trained to forecast whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of math and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (mathematics, shows, reasoning) and non-reasoning (innovative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) data. Reasoning information was generated by “professional designs”. Non-reasoning data was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by humans. – The “skilled designs” were trained by beginning with an undefined base model, then SFT on both information, and synthetic data created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and verify during thinking. Then the professional models were RL utilizing an unspecified reward function.
– Each professional design was trained to produce simply artificial reasoning data in one specific domain (mathematics, programs, logic).
– Expert models were used, rather of R1 itself, considering that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor formatting, and extreme length”.

4. Model-based benefit models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice data including both last reward and chain-of-thought causing the last benefit. The reward model produced reward signals for both concerns with unbiased but free-form answers, and concerns without unbiased answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both benefit designs and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was calculated for math problems with a final response (put in a box), and for programming problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed substantial low-level engineering to accomplish performance. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the standard 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM regimens to build up accurately. They utilized a customized 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They lessened the interaction latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and communication, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They decreased interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific machine each professional was on in order to avoid particular machines being queried more often than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available by means of DeepSeek’s API, in addition to through a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek declared that it exceeded performance of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it used 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a service quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business also released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information generated by R1. [47]

A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant initially considers the thinking process in the mind and then provides the user with the response. The reasoning procedure and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking process here respond to here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based reward. All benefit functions were rule-based, “generally” of 2 types (other types were not specified): accuracy rewards and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was checking whether a boxed answer is proper (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format benefit was inspecting whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has concerns with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to resolve these problems and further enhance reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL procedure as R1-Zero, however likewise with a “language consistency benefit” to motivate it to react monolingually. This produced an internal design not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal model, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the generated thinking had an incorrect last answer, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable method as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly answers questions, fixes logic issues and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes considerably fewer resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to have required just about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested developing its latest AI . [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive performance at relatively very little expense has actually been acknowledged as possibly challenging the international supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 model was reportedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s most current designs when utilized for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen also explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely praised DeepSeek as a national property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with professionals and asked him to supply viewpoints and tips on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 federal government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted possible limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, which consist of export constraints on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI designs subsequently “triggered market turmoil” [57] and triggered shares in major international innovation companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech firms likewise sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 design, had led to tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had mixed responses to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are included in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very remarkable”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed skepticism of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to use the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interfered with the appropriate functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the official application programming interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers located in China, uses censorship mechanisms for subjects that are thought about politically sensitive for the government of China. For example, the design refuses to answer concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might initially generate an answer, but then deletes it quickly afterwards and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my existing scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship systems and constraints can only be eliminated to a limited degree in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist values” defined by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and stated: “We securely oppose any form of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are dedicated to accomplishing the complete reunification of the motherland through peaceful ways.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers had the ability to deceive DeepSeek into providing specific answers to some of these topics by requesting in its response to switch certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some professionals fear that the government of China might use the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading out disinformation, surveillance and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms and conditions say “We store the info we collect in secure servers found in individuals’s Republic of China … We might gather your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you offer to our model and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security concerns. [80] In response, the Italian data protection authority is looking for extra details on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal data, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually started a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government banned using DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s use of individual information. [83]

Artificial intelligence industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required selecting “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user might utilize it only 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s low-cost, open AI design DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world ready to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper designs and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI facilities costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might strike India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia examination signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you must know”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI model conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI model surpasses Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design appears to be among the best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first reasoning design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese company unveils AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek postures a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI design breakthrough highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers worldwide AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely excellent”: “We should take the developments out of China extremely, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘remarkable'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “positive””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests enormous Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, including Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily limited brand-new sign-ups, pointing out ‘large-scale malicious attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t care about free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI poses powerful cyber, data personal privacy threats”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts urge care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines impact of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, official states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.